A Comprehensive Comparison of the Phase Change Material-Based Internal and External Cooling Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, phase change material (PCM) is used internally and externally in managing the heat generation of cylindrical Li-ion batteries during high rate discharges. Both internal and external cooling systems are thoroughly compared in their cooling effect on batteries of different sizes (18650, 21700, and 26650) and radial thermal conductivities, their cooling effect on battery packs of different layers (2, 4, and 8 layers of batteries), the necessity using high thermally conductive PCM in the cooling systems, as well as their weight and volume added to the battery system. Results show that the internal cooling system is more suitable for high specific energy applications. It is less sensitive to the battery radial thermal conductivity and performs better for large battery packs and thick batteries. While the external cooling system is more space-saving and suitable for 2-layer battery packs with forced convection applied at the battery pack side walls. However, its performance deteriorates as the thermal conductivity of PCM and batteries decreases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".