Cathode Catalysts Based on Cobalt- and Nitrogen-Doped Nanocarbon Composites for Anion Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cobalt- and nitrogen-doped carbide-derived carbon/carbon nanotube (CDC/CNT) composites are prepared and used as oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) electrocatalysts for an anion exchange membrane fuel cell (AEMFC) cathode. For the doping, high-temperature pyrolysis is applied using a cobalt salt and a nitrogen precursor (either dicyandiamide, urea, or melamine). During the doping, (i) new mesopores are formed as confirmed by the N2 physisorption results, (ii) atomically dispersed cobalt is present on the catalysts as detected by scanning transmission electron microscopy, and (iii) N-pyridinic and Co–N4 are the dominant N-containing species as shown by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. This indicates that using the composite of CDC and CNTs as well as the cobalt salt and nitrogen precursor is advantageous for the preparation of electrocatalysts. All three catalyst materials demonstrate similarly good electrocatalytic activity toward O2 electroreduction in alkaline medium and excellent stability after 10000 repetitive potential cycles. The Co-N-CDC/CNT catalyst as the cathode material together with a hexamethyl-p-terphenyl poly(benzimidazolium) (HMT-PMBI) membrane exhibits excellent AEMFC performance by reaching maximum power density of 577 mW cm–2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it