MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025075604 · doi:10.1109/tap.2021.3060083

Complex Eigenmodes and Eigenfrequencies in Electromagnetics

2021· preprint· en· W3025075604 on OpenAlexafffund
João G. Nizer Rahmeier, Ville Tiukuvaara, Shulabh Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOmegaPropagation constantDispersion relationMetamaterialPhysicsMathematical analysisWave propagationLossy compressionElectromagneticsMathematicsOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A comprehensive treatment on complex eigenmodes is presented for general lossy traveling-wave electromagnetic structures. The per unit length propagation phase shift ( β)-dependent complex eigenfrequencies Ω(β) are mapped to frequency-dependent complex propagation constant γ(ω <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0</sub> ) for a variety of electromagnetic structures. Rigorous procedures are presented to compute the complex eigenmodes of both uniform and periodic electromagnetic structures, confirmed using full-wave simulations and known analytical results. We further present two mapping procedures for arbitrary uniform and periodic structures, where the known {Ω-β} relationship is expressed using rational polynomial expansions. Consequently, replacing {Ω, jβ} with {ω <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0</sub> , γ} in the known {Ω-β} relation, a characteristic equation is formed, which is then numerically solved for the propagation constant γ, representing the physical dispersion relation ω <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0</sub> (β) and the frequency-dependent attenuation relation α(ω <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">0</sub> ) of the structure. The mapping procedure is demonstrated for a variety of cases, including an unbounded uniform media, a rectangular waveguide, a Drude dispersive metamaterial, a biased ferrite medium, a periodic dielectric stack, and a periodic rectangular waveguide. The exact propagation characteristics have been successfully retrieved in all cases across both passbands and stopbands across frequency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.929

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207