MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Relationship Between Left Ventricular Geometry and Invasive Hemodynamics in Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension

2020· article· en· W3025135749 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Imaging · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineCardiologyHemodynamicsCardiac catheterizationPulmonary hypertensionOdds ratioParasternal line

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Ventricular septal flattening, frequently present in pulmonary hypertension (PH), can be quantified using eccentricity index (EI). EI has not been evaluated by concurrent echocardiography and cardiac catheterization and traditionally does not account for postsystolic septal flattening, often seen in PH. We evaluated left ventricular shape, including a novel measure of maximal EI to account for postsystolic septal flattening, to establish the relationship with concurrent invasive hemodynamics. Methods Echocardiography was performed at 2 institutions in 78 pediatric PH patients during cardiac catheterization and in 78 matched controls. From midpapillary parasternal short-axis views, EI and right-to-left ventricular diameter ratio were assessed. Results EI and right-to-left ventricular measures were significantly increased in PH compared with controls. Shape measures correlated with invasive hemodynamics and PH outcome measures (PH-related hospitalization, functional class, medical therapy escalation, and BNP [brain natriuretic peptide]). End-systolic EI of 1.16 best identified the presence of PH, whereas a maximal EI of 1.42 and 1.94 best identified half-systemic and systemic PH, respectively. A maximal EI of 1.27 was associated with an odds ratio of 16.16 (95% CI, 6.62-39.46) for PH-related hospitalization or escalation of therapy. Conclusions Using simultaneous echocardiography and catheterization in the largest study population to date, we demonstrate that EI and right-to-left ventricular ratio correlate with invasive hemodynamics and outcomes measures, and EI can accurately define those with clinically important PH. These measures strengthen the ability of echocardiography to identify and follow pediatric PH patients, especially in the absence of methods to quantify right ventricular systolic pressures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.851

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it