MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025253080 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-013514mtgabs

Membrane-Free Redox Electrochemical Cell Towards Large Scale Energy Storage

2020· article· en· W3025253080 on OpenAlexaffabout
Senthil Velan Venkatesan, Kunal Karan, Steve Larter, Venkataraman Thangadurai

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCathodeAnodeRedoxElectrolyteEnergy storageElectrochemistryChemistryElectrodeChemical engineeringRenewable energyInorganic chemistryMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Renewable energy sources are forecasted to supply half of the global energy demand in the future. Development of improved and cost-effective energy storage methods are in high demand due to the intermittency and locally distributed nature of renewable energy sources [1]. Redox flow battery (RFB) is a candidate technology for large-scale energy storage that can be coupled with renewable energy to alleviate intermittency problem [2]. A major contributor to the cost (40%) of RFB is the polymer electrolyte membrane, which is supposed to separate the catholyte and the anolyte [3]. Here, we propose membrane-free design wherein the classical anolyte and catholyte compartment, each with a redox auxiliary electrode pair, are connected by a metal wire. This design relieves the restriction of finding a common electrolyte for the anode and cathode chamber and eliminates the cross-over of undesirable ions between the two chambers. Thus, the new design offers the flexibility of using a wide variety of redox electrolytes (alkaline/acidic or aqueous/non-aqueous) in anode and cathode chambers independently [4]. For example, two compartment redox cell with a pair of auxiliary electrode allows the use of aqueous (acidic/alkaline) or nonaqueous (acidic/alkaline) electrolytes in anode and cathode chambers independent of one another, with electron conducting material connecting the auxiliary electrodes in both chambers during charging and discharging reactions as shown in Figure 1 . When oxidation occurs at the anode, corresponding auxiliary electrode udergoes reduction and hence an oxidized materials must be supplied here. Whereas, reduction occurs at the cathode and corresponding auxiliary electrode udergoes oxidation and hence a reduced materials must be supplied to enable a spontaenous charging and discharging of the redox electrolyte. The novel design helps couple spatially separated oxidation and reduction processes. Since, there is no membrane and mass transport across the chambers, the cost, performance, and degradation issues related to membrane are avoided. Alkaline and acidic electrolytes can be used indepenedent of the content in the other chamber. When the solubility of one type of redox electrolyte is limited or zero in aqueous solvent, that particular redox electrolyte alone can be dissolved in a different media/solvent and retain the counter electrolyte in aqueous based solvent [5]. Acknowledgements This research was undertaken thanks in part to funding from the University of Calgary and the Canada First Research Excellence Fund. References 1. Larcher, D. Tarascon, Jean-Marie. Nat. Chem. 7 (2015) 19-29. 2. Grigorii Soloveichik, Nature. 505 (2014) 163-165. 3. Puiki Leung, T. Martin, Akeel A. Shah, Mohd Rusllim Mohamed, Marc A. Anderson, Jesus Palma, J. Power Sources. 341 (2017) 36-45. 4. Senthil Velan Venkatesan, Venkataraman Thangadurai, Steve Larter, Kunal Karan, Jagos Radovic, US provisional patent application 62/887,464 filed August 15, 2019. 5. Senthil Velan Venkatesan, Kunal Karan, Steve Larter, Venkataraman Thangadurai, Sustainable Energy & Fuels. (2019) doi:1039/C9SE00734B. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced battery technologies researchFrench-language works237,207