MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025277746 · doi:10.1161/hcq.13.suppl_1.324

Abstract 324: Use of Troponin Testing After Non-cardiac Surgery in Ontario

2020· article· en· W3025277746 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paymon Azizi, Maria Koh, Peter C. Austin, Lu Han, Angela Jerath, Duminda N. Wijeysundera, Harindra C. Wijeysundera, Dennis T. Ko

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalSunnybrook Health Science CentreInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTroponinMyocardial infarctionCardiac surgeryGuidelineSurgeryCohortInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Myocardial infarction after non-cardiac surgery is common and associated with worse patient outcomes. In 2017, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) published guidelines endorsing postoperative cardiac troponin surveillance in higher-risk patients having non-cardiac surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the proportion of non-cardiac surgery patients recommended for post-operative troponin testing and use of troponin testing in accordance with this guideline. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients aged 40-105 years having moderate to high risk non-cardiac surgery in Ontario, Canada from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2017. Classes of surgeries included orthopedics, gynecology, general, urology, vascular, and thoracic. Recommendations for troponin testing was determined by CCS criteria. Troponin testing within 2 days of the surgery was ascertained using the Ontario Laboratory Information System. Results: There were 268,269 patients in the cohort recommended for troponin testing during the study period. Mean age was 66.7 ± 11.9 years, 58.2% were female, and 12.3% underwent urgent surgery. According to CCS guidelines, 72.4% of elective surgery patients and 81.2% of urgent surgery patients would be recommended for post-operative troponin screening. The observed testing rate was 10.5% for elective patients and 26.4% for urgent surgery patients. Observed rates of testing for CCS recommended patients varied significantly by surgery: 5.5% for hysterectomies to 64.0% for open abdominal aortic aneurism repair (see Figure). Conclusions: Based on the current CCS guidelines, the majority of patients undergoing moderate to high-risk surgery should receive troponin testing. However, testing rates in Ontario were substantially lower with significant variations based on the type of surgery. The implication for routine troponin testing recommendation is substantial given the low utilization of troponin testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation Cardiovascular Quality and OutcomesSame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207