MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025321979 · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102272

Striatal shape alteration as a staging biomarker for Parkinson’s Disease

2020· article· en· W3025321979 on OpenAlexafffund
Maxime Peralta, John S. H. Baxter, Ali R. Khan, Claire Haegelen, Pierre Jannin

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroImage Clinical · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsRobarts Clinical TrialsWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaServierFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleUCBInstitut de Neurosciences des SystèmesTakeda Pharmaceutical CompanyTeva Pharmaceutical IndustriesMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsParkinson's diseasePutamenBiomarkerNeuroscienceCohortMedicinePsychologyDiseasePathologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parkinson's Disease provokes alterations of subcortical deep gray matter, leading to subtle changes in the shape of several subcortical structures even before the manifestation of motor and non-motor clinical symptoms. We used an automated registration and segmentation pipeline to measure this structural alteration in one early and one advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) cohorts, one prodromal stage cohort and one healthy control cohort. These structural alterations are then passed to a machine learning pipeline to classify these populations. Our workflow is able to distinguish different stages of PD based solely on shape analysis of the bilateral caudate nucleus and putamen, with balanced accuracies in the range of 59% to 85%. Furthermore, we compared the significance of each of these subcortical structure, compared the performances of different classifiers on this task, thus quantifying the informativeness of striatal shape alteration as a staging bio-marker for PD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score0.773

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroImage ClinicalSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207