MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025336492 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-018740mtgabs

(Invited) Custom Low-Dimensional Material Systems Explored at the Atomic Scale

2020· article· en· W3025336492 on OpenAlexaff
Adina Luican‐Mayer

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topic2D Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharacterization (materials science)Scanning tunneling microscopeNanotechnologyMaterials scienceAtomic unitsSemiconductorDiamondGrapheneEngineering physicsPhysicsOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Innovative technologies have a history of capitalizing on the discovery of new physical phenomena, often at the confluence of advances in material characterization techniques and innovations in design and controlled synthesis of high-quality materials. Pioneered by the discovery of graphene, atomically thin materials (2D materials) hold the promise for realizing physical systems with distinct properties, previously inaccessible. In this talk I will describe experiments that seek to uncover the novel physical phenomena in 2D materials by using scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy (STM/STS) and supporting spectroscopic techniques. Firstly, I will discuss the 1T polymorph of TaS2, which has one of the richest phase diagrams among the layered transition metal dichalcogenides and address the question of crossover from bulk to few layers. Secondly, I will describe atomic-scale characterization of the in-plane anisotropic semiconductor ReS2. We demonstrate that rhenium atoms form diamond-shaped clusters, organized in disjointed chains, and characterize the semiconducting electronic band gap by STS. By spatially mapping the local density of states around defects in ReS2, we explore their origin and electrostatic nature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.218

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0650.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topic2D Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207