Emotional and personality features of patients with irritable bowel syndrome and bowel inflammatory diseases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: To conduct a comparative analysis of the emotional and personality characteristics of patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in remission with IBS-like symptoms. Patients and methods: This study carried out based at a specialized gastroenterology clinic in the period from 2010 to 2015 included 125 patients with IBS (IBS-D - 46, IBS-C - 20, IBS-M - 59) and 37 patients with IBD in remission: Crohn's disease (CD) - 11 and ulcerative colitis (UC) -26 patients. The levels of depression (Beck questionnaire), urgent and personal anxiety (Spielberger questionnaire), the degree of alexithymia (Toronto scale) as well as the severity of psychopathology and behavioral symptoms (PBS) were estimated. Results: Patients with IBS were not significantly different from those with IBD in remission with IBS-like symptoms in terms of depression, actual anxiety, alexithymia and PBS. Only the index of personal anxiety was significantly higher in the group of patients with IBS compared with IBD in remission with IBS-like symptoms (p = 0.0376). Men with IBS exhibited significantly higher actual anxiety than men with IBD (p = 0.04). Maximum severity of depression, anxiety and alexithymia was documented in the locking version of IBS (IBS-C) in comparison with other variants of IBS (p <0.05). Patients with CD in remission are characterized by higher rates of depression and alexithymia compared to UC (p <0.05). Behavioural disorders are most pronounced in the diarrheal variant of IBS and CD. Conclusion: A higher personal anxiety was observed in patients with IBS compared to those in remission of IBD with IBS-like symptoms although other parameters were not significantly different. Patients with IBS-C were characterized by more pronounced manifestations of emotional and personality disorders. More severe emotional and behavioral disorders distinguish CD from UC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".