MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025430986 · doi:10.1007/s12079-020-00568-1

Slow train coming: an anti-CCN2 strategy reverses a model of chronic overuse muscle fibrosis

2020· article· en· W3025430986 on OpenAlex
Andrew Leask

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cell Communication and Signaling · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective Tissue Growth Factor Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFibrosisMedicineMuscular dystrophyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the first targets proposed as an anti-fibrotic therapy was CCN2. Proof of its involvement in fibrosis was initially difficult, due to the lack of appropriate reagents and general understanding of the molecular mechanisms responsible for persistent fibrosis. As these issues have been progressively resolved over the last twenty-five years, it has become clear that CCN2 is a bone fide target for anti-fibrotic intervention. An anti-CCN2 antibody (FG-3019) is in Phase III clinical trials for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and pancreatic cancer, and in Phase II for Duschenne's muscular dystrophy. An exciting paper recently published by Mary Barbe and the Popoff group has shown that FG-3019 reduces established muscle fibrosis (Barbe et al., FASEB J 34:6554-6569, 2020). Intriguingly, FG-3019 blocked the decreased expression of the anti-fibrotic protein CCN3, caused by the injury model. These important data support the notion that targeting CCN2 in the fibrotic microenvironment may reverse established fibrosis, making it the first agent currently in development to do so.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it