Instrumento para a avaliação familiar da criança com incongruência de gênero
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivo: apresentar a experiência do desenvolvimento de um instrumento de avaliação para sistematizar os cuidados de enfermagem da família da criança com incongruência de gênero. Método: trata-se de um estudo descritivo, tipo relato de experiência, sobre a construção de um instrumento para sistematizar a assistência de enfermagem à família da criança atendida em um ambulatório de gênero e sexualidades na infância e na adolescência de um hospital geral universitário. Desenvolveu-se a construção com base nas etapas do Processo de Enfermagem pelos Modelos Calgary de Avaliação e Intervenção Familiar. Conclusão: concluiu-se que o uso de um instrumento de avaliação permite, ao enfermeiro, obter uma macroavaliação dos pontos fortes e problemas da família, apoiando a tomada de decisão e fornecendo subsídios para o estabelecimento de problemas, pontos fortes e intervenções de enfermagem que respaldam a avaliação do cuidado integral da família assistida nessa clínica. Descritores: Processo de Enfermagem; Avaliação em Enfermagem; Família; Criança; Identidade de Gênero; Saúde Mental.AbstractObjective: to report the experience of building up an evaluation tool to systematize the nursing care of the child's family with gender incongruity. Method: this is a descriptive study, case report type, on the building up of a tool to systematize nursing care to the family of the child attended in an outpatient clinic for gender and sexualities in childhood and adolescence of a general university hospital. Building up was developed based on the stages of the Nursing Process using the Calgary Models of Family Assessment and Intervention. Conclusion: it was concluded that the use of an assessment tool allows nurses to obtain a macro-assessment of the family's strengths and problems, supporting decision making and providing support for the establishment of nursing problems, strengths and interventions that support the assessment of comprehensive care of the family assisted in this clinic. Descriptors: Nursing Process; Nursing Assessment; Family; Child; Gender Identity; Mental Health.ResumenObjetivo: presentar la experiencia del desarrollo de un instrumento de evaluación para sistematizar la atención de enfermería de la familia del niño con incongruencia de género. Método: se trata de un estudio descriptivo, tipo de informe de experiencia, sobre la construcción de un instrumento para sistematizar la atención de enfermería a la familia del niño atendido en una consulta externa de género y sexualidad en la infancia y adolescencia de un hospital universitario general. La construcción se desarrolló basada a las etapas del Proceso de Enfermería utilizando los Modelos de Evaluación e Intervención Familiar de Calgary. Conclusión: se concluyó que el uso de una herramienta de evaluación permite a las enfermeras obtener una macroevaluación de las fortalezas y problemas de la familia, apoyando la toma de decisiones y brindando apoyo para el establecimiento de problemas, fortalezas e intervenciones de enfermería que apoyan la evaluación de la atención integral de la familia asistida en esta clínica. Descriptores: Proceso de Enfermería; Evaluación en Enfermería; Familia; Niño; Identidad de Género; Salud Mental.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.019 | 0.055 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".