MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025485156 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-017690mtgabs

(Invited) Photoswitchable Near-Infrared Emitters Based on Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Hybrids

2020· article· en· W3025485156 on OpenAlexaff
Antoine G. Godin, Antonio Setaro, Morgane Gandil, Rainer Haag, Mohsen Adeli, Stephanie Reich, Laurent Cognet

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbon nanotubeInfraredMaterials scienceNanotechnologyNanomaterialsMoleculeNanophotonicsOptoelectronicsOpticsChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Super-resolution microscopy (SRM) has set a new paradigm in the field of optical imaging by delivering images with resolution much better than the diffraction limit. We demonstrated over the last years that such approaches can be designed to understand basic excitonic processes in carbon nanotubes [1-2]. In the field of bioimaging, SRM is currently limited to the visible range, missing the near-infrared region where biological tissues are however the most transparent. One reason for this is that single-molecule photoswitchable emitters, which are the basic ingredients to achieve single-molecule SRM, have not yet been developed in the near-infrared. To fill this gap, we have recently introduced a novel type of hybrid nanomaterials consisting of single-wall carbon nanotubes covalently functionalized with photo-switching molecules that are used to control the intrinsic luminescence of the single nanotubes in the near-infrared (beyond 1 µm) [3]. Through the control of photoswitching, we demonstrate super-localization imaging of nanotubes unresolved by diffraction limited microscopy opening the route toward SRM in the near-infrared for biological applications. Photocontrol of individual near-infrared emitters will also be highly desirable for elementary optical molecular switches or information storage elements since most communication data transfer protocols are established in this spectral range. References [1] Cognet et al Nanoletters , 8 (2008) 749 - 753. [2] Danné et al. ACS Nano , 12 (2018) 6059 [3] Godin et al Science Advances, 5, (2019) eaax1166

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207