L’expérience de la maternité en contexte d’immigration récente au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Present the results of a study of the experience of maternity in the context of a recent immigration to Quebec. METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were carried out amongst mothers from different countries, having immigrated within the last five years. L'Écuyer's (1990) developmental analysis of the content was used to analyze the results. RESULTS: The data collected from 15 participants demonstrates that they perceive their motherly role as a great responsibility. During the postnatal phase, these women develop autonomy as mothers, but they also suffer from isolation and often only have their spouse to rely on. They experience a vast range of emotions such as happiness, anxiety, and sadness. Their level of distress depends on their representation of their maternity and immigration. To ensure their wellbeing, they keep in touch with their origins and use the professional services available. CONCLUSION: The transition into motherhood leads to a great disruption of these women's lives. Due to social isolation, their responsibilities as mothers seem even more intense. The partner, considered an ally, thus plays an important role by their side. They struggle with trusting Quebecers, however, some services are greatly appreciated: the in-home visit of nurses, the guide From Tiny Tot to Toddler and the Info-Santé telephone service. It would be relevant to conduct more studies on the reality of immigrant fathers and to consider increasing the number of in-home nurse or midwife visits for mothers who are less socially integrated and who perceive their immigration negatively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".