MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025633072 · doi:10.1007/1345_2020_110

Least-Squares Spectral and Coherency Analysis of the Zenith Total Delay Time Series at SuomiNet Station SA56 (UNB2)

2020· book-chapter· en· W3025633072 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Anthony Omeiza Mayaki, Marcelo C. Santos, Thalia Nikolaidou

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Association of Geodesy symposia · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGNSS positioning and interference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsZenithEnvironmental scienceTroposphereMeteorologyRelative humidityOscillation (cell signaling)GNSS applicationsAtmospheric sciencesHydrostatic equilibriumClimatologyGeodesySatelliteGeographyGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Zenith Total Delay (ZTD) from ground-based Global Navigational Satellite Systems (GNSS) observations plays an important role in meteorology. It contains information about the troposphere due to the interactions that GNSS signals have with the atmosphere while traveling from satellites to ground receivers. Since almost all weather is formed in the troposphere, the analysis of a collection of ZTD time series would provide insight about the periodic characteristics of the weather of a place. It would also provide insight about the influences that meteorological parameters such as pressure, temperature and relative humidity have on the weather’s periodic nature. In this study, the least-squares spectral analysis approach is employed to determine the periodic oscillations in a 7-year time series of ZTD obtained from collocated GNSS and meteorological stations at the University of New Brunswick, Fredericton. Least-Squares Coherency Analysis of the time series spectra of the ZTD and its component hydrostatic and wet delays, and pressure, temperature and relative humidity is also performed. This is done to evaluate the level of contributions those parameters have in the periodicities inherent in the ZTD time series. Except for the zenith hydrostatic delay and pressure which show no annual periodic oscillation, the spectra of all the other time series show strong annual and semi-annual oscillations. Being the most dominant oscillation in the ZTD time series, the annual oscillation is largely driven by temperature, and this is maybe due to the high temperature variation characteristic of the climatic zone Fredericton falls under.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.881

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Association of Geodesy symposiaSame topicGNSS positioning and interferenceFrench-language works237,207