Performance Evaluation of Chinese High-Speed Railway Bridges Under Seismic Loads
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The multi-span simply supported (MSSS) box girder bridge is the most used structural form for the high-speed railway (HSR) in China. In structural design, it is required that the MSSS bridge system has high stiffness and low deflection under the operation loads. With the expansion of the HSR network to regions that are seismically active, the seismic performance of MSSS bridges in these regions is an issue of great concern. In this study, the performance-based earthquake engineering (PBEE) methodology originally developed to quantify the seismic performance of buildings and bridges has been adopted to quantify the seismic performance of the HSR MSSS bridges in China. Typically, a four-span MSSS bridge used in China’s Sichuan–Yunnan HSR lines has been extensively assessed by the PBEE approach. This study is the first of its kind to systematically identify and quantify the damage states, repair actions, repair costs and travel delay losses for China’s HSR MSSS bridge system. The results reveal that the financial loss from the MSSS bridge system is highly dependent on the anchorage capacity of the fixed bearings. Overall, the costs of travel delay outweigh those for structural repair. Most of the financial loss can be attributed to the functional loss of the track-slab components and bearings of the HSR MSSS bridge system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it