MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025693162 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-012155mtgabs

Diffusion Control of Organic Cathode Materials in Lithium Metal Battery Using a Graphite Modified Separator

2020· article· en· W3025693162 on OpenAlexaff
Rachel L. Belanger, Basile Commarieu, Andrea Paolella, Jean‐Christophe Daigle, Jérôme P. Claverie, Karim Zaghib

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeparator (oil production)CathodeMaterials scienceAnodeElectrolyteChemical engineeringSolubilityOrganic radical batteryCapacity lossEnergy storageBattery (electricity)GraphiteElectrodeOrganic chemistryChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy storage technology is a critical research area for the success of portable electronic devices and electrical transportation. Such applications need affordable, durable, safe and environmentally friendly battery materials with high energy density. Organic cathode materials are currently promising candidates because they fulfill most of these requirements for an active battery material 1 . However, they usually suffer from a major limitation, namely their solubility in organic electrolytes 2 . Even a very low solubility translates into a decreased capacity upon cycling due to the loss of active material. Among organic cathode materials, conjugated carbonyl compounds have been intensively scrutinized because of a combination of desirable properties, such as low cost, good theoretical capacity, reversible oxidative behavior, high discharge potential and commercial availability. For example, 3,4,9,10-perylene-tetracarboxylic-dianhydride (PTCDA) is an inexpensive red pigment that is widely investigated as an active material for energy devices. However, Li-PTCDA batteries suffer from poor and irreversible cycling stability due to the dissolution in the electrolyte. Even more problematic, the dissolved PTCDA migrates through the porous separator and deposits on the anode surface causing irreversible damage 3 . In order to solve this problem, chemical modifications such as polymerisation, functionalization and immobilization on carbon materials have improved cycling stability. However, these modified cathode materials, which are often prepared by complex processes, contain considerable amounts of inactive mass that cause a decreases of the energy density. We developed a Janus membrane, which consists of two layers – a commercial polypropylene separator (Celgard TM ) and a 300-600 nm layer of exfoliated graphite that was applied by a simple and environmentally friendly process. The submicron graphite layer is only permeable to Li + and it drastically improves the battery performance, as measured by capacity retention and high coulombic efficiency, even at 2C rates. Post-mortem analysis of the battery indicates that the new membrane protects the anode against corrosion, and cathode dissolution is reduced. This graphite-based membrane is expected to greatly expedite the deployment of lithium batteries using organic moities as active materials. References [1] Armand, M. & Tarascon, J. M. Building better batteries. Nature 451, 652–657 (2008). [2] Zhao, Q., Zhu, Z. & Chen, J. Molecular Engineering with Organic Carbonyl Electrode Materials for Advanced Stationary and Redox Flow Rechargeable Batteries. Adv. Mater. 29, 1–25 (2017). [3] Wang, J., Wang, X., Li, H., Yang, X. & Zhang, Y. Intrinsic factors attenuate the performance of anhydride organic cathode materials of lithium battery. J. Electroanal. Chem. 773, 22–26 (2016).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207