MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025695752

Charactering priority pollutants in juvenile chinook salmon in the Fraser River Estuary Watershed

2020· article· en· W3025695752 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tanya M. Brown, Bonnie P. Lo, Kj Sadler, Vicki L. Marlatt, Dave C Scott, Katerina Colbourne, Kelsey Delisle, Marie Noël, Misty MacDuffee

Bibliographic record

VenueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityRaincoast Conservation FoundationEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinook windEstuaryFisheryWatershedEnvironmental scienceJuvenilePollutantHydrology (agriculture)Drainage basinGeographyOncorhynchusFish <Actinopterygii>GeologyEcologyBiologyCartography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Fraser River watershed, British Columbia provides habitat for Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), which delivers food for First Nations, recreational anglers, commercial fisheries and endangered Southern Resident killer whales (SRKW, Orcinus orca). Extensive forestry, agricultural, industrial and urban activities take place in the Fraser Valley exposing early life history stages of Chinook to a mix of legacy and emerging contaminants, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), pesticides and pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs). Many of these contaminants can elicit adverse health effects in vertebrates, including endocrine disruption and reproductive effects. However, there exists limited information on the nature of contaminants discharged into salmon habitat in British Columbia, hampering solution-oriented opportunities for natural resource managers and stakeholders. The present study characterizes priority pollutants in juvenile chinook salmon, water, and sediments throughout the Fraser Estuary. Samples were collected in the proximity of two large wastewater treatment plants. A number of analytes detected in fish tissue, sediment, and effluent, were not detected in estuarine waters, suggesting bioaccumulation of these compounds. This study is the first step toward a comprehensive risk-based evaluation of contaminants of concern to wild juvenile chinook in the Fraser Estuary. Results will support the Government of Canada’s Whales Initiative in its quest to identify those contaminants of greatest concern to the primary prey of SRKW and to guide recovery efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.885

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWestern CEDAR (Western Washington University)Same topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207