MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025703359 · doi:10.1177/1099636220925073

Experiments and nonlinear analysis of the impact behaviour of sandwich panels constructed with flax fibre-reinforced polymer faces and foam cores

2020· article· en· W3025703359 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sandwich Structures & Materials · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNatural Fiber Reinforced Composites
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceComposite materialCore (optical fiber)Compression (physics)Structural engineeringNonlinear systemStiffnessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the effects of climate change become more apparent, it is necessary that environmental impact is considered in every aspect of our society, including the design of new infrastructure. The use of natural materials for building construction is one way to improve the sustainability of infrastructure and therefore it is important that the behaviour of structures made with natural materials be investigated extensively and well understood. In this study, the performance of sandwich panels constructed with flax fibre-reinforced polymer faces and foam cores under impact loading is studied experimentally and analytically. The parameters of the tests were facing thickness (1, 2 and 3 layers of flax fabric) and core density (32, 64 and 96 kg/m 3 ). Each specimen was 1220 mm long, 152 mm wide and approximately 80 mm thick and was tested by a 10.41 kg drop weight impact at mid-span. Each specimen was tested multiple times starting at a drop height of 100 mm and increasing the height by 100 mm for each subsequent test until ultimate failure. The results indicate that the ultimate impact energy increases with both core density and face thickness. The four main failure modes observed were: compression face crushing, compression face wrinkling, core shear and tension face rupture. The failure modes observed generally matched those observed during similar quasi-static testing. Additionally, a nonlinear incremental iterative model was developed based on the conservation of energy during an impact event and the nonlinear mechanical behaviour of both the fibre-reinforced polymer faces and foam cores. This novel model accurately predicts the total deflection and face strains based on the energy of an impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.721

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it