MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025772118 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-01161075mtgabs

(Invited) Photoluminescence Diagnostics of Nanoscale Dissolution of III-V Semiconductor Nanoheterostructures

2020· article· en· W3025772118 on OpenAlexaff
Jan J. Dubowski

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSemiconductorEtching (microfabrication)Materials scienceOptoelectronicsPhotoluminescenceFabricationNanotechnologyNanoscopic scaleDry etchingLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Etching of semiconducting materials with atomic level resolution is of high interest to technologies addressing the fabrication of low-dimensional devices and the tunability of their optoelectronic properties. Atomic layer etching (ALE) based on cycling between a self-limited surface reaction and selective removal of the reaction products is a promising technique addressing the challenges of controlling the variability necessary in the atomic-scale material removal [1]. However, the requirement to alter the processing hardware while completing two cycles of ALE, as well as the lack of a simple diagnostic technique for monitoring in situ material etching with a sub-monolayer resolution, have restricted the application of this technique to laboratories equipped with relatively expensive hardware infrastructures. To alleviate some of the problems of the ALE technique, we have investigated digital photo-assisted etching of GaAs/AlGaAs nanoheterostructures, which has the potential to offer a simple approach for fabrication of low-dimensional devices. The premise of this approach is based on the expectation that dark corrosion of a semiconductor is negligible in a processed solution. This is the case, for instance, for some of the III-V semiconductors immersed in deionized water or weak aqueous solutions of ammonia. The photo-ALE is an innovative method of a cycled digital photocorrosion (DIP) of semiconductors that we have explored for shallow etching of three-dimensional GaAs/AlGaAs nanoheterostructures [2, 3]. The rate and stability of DIP depends on the energy and intensity of photons employed for optical excitation of the samples, as well as on the chemistry of a liquid environment employed for processing [4]. The excitation of electron-hole pairs allows the convenient application of the photoluminescence (PL) effect for monitoring in situ of the DIP process. The DIP process can also be monitored by measuring the open circuit potential of revealed surfaces [5], which is of a particular interest to materials with negligible PL emission. In the frame of this presentation, I will discuss some fundamental aspects of the DIP process and application of the PL effect for monitoring sub-monolayer removal of GaAs and AlGaAs. The compatibility of the photo-ALE technology with the chemistry of liquids employed for passivation of surfaces and coating with self-assembled monolayers offers the potential for in situ passivation of atomically clean surfaces. Furthermore, the sensitivity of a low-excitation intensity generated PL signal to surface defects allows spatially-resolvable recording of the perturbation of the DIP process. I will also discuss the perspective of an application of the photo-ALE to other III-V materials, as well as to Si and SiGe. ______________________ [1] K. J. Kanarik et al. , "Overview of atomic layer etching in the semiconductor industry," Journal of Vacuum Science& Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films, vol. 33, no. 2, p. 020802, 2015, doi: 10.1116/1.4913379. [2] S. Aithal, N. Liu, and J. J. Dubowski, "Photocorrosion metrology of photoluminescence emitting GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructures," Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 50, no. 3, p. 035106, 2017. [3] M. R. Aziziyan, H. Sharma, and J. J. Dubowski, "Photo-Atomic Layer Etching of GaAs/AlGaAs Nanoheterostructures," Acs Appl Mater Inter, vol. 11, no. 19, pp. 17968-17978, 2019/05/15 2019, doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b02079. [4] H. Sharma, K. Moumanis, and J. J. Dubowski, "pH-Dependent Photocorrosion of GaAs/AlGaAs Quantum Well Microstructures," The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, vol. 120, no. 45, pp. 26129-26137, 2016/11/17 2016, doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b08844. [5]. S. Aithal and J. J. Dubowski, "Open circuit potential monitored digital photocorrosion of GaAs/AlGaAs quantum well microstructures," Appl Phys Lett, vol. 112, no. 15, p. 153102, 2018, doi: 10.1063/1.5023134.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and DevicesFrench-language works237,207