MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025802452 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-013474mtgabs

Degradation of Carbon Electrodes in the Vanadium Redox Flow Battery

2020· article· en· W3025802452 on OpenAlexaff
Ashutosh Kumar Singh, Nael Yasri, Maedeh Pahlevaninezhad, Edward P.L. Roberts

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced battery technologies research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVanadiumElectrodeMaterials scienceCarbon fibersFlow batteryElectrochemistryBattery (electricity)Degradation (telecommunications)ElectrolyteX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyRaman spectroscopyRedoxAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical engineeringChemistryComposite materialMetallurgyElectrical engineeringEnvironmental chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Vanadium Redox Flow Battery (VRFB) is a promising candidate for large scale energy storage. These systems are expected to operate for long cycle life ~ 10 years of lifetime (~ 500 - 2000 charge – discharge cycles). 1 The VRFB’s system includes an posolyte (VO 2 + /VO 2+ ) and negolyte (V 2+ /V 3+ ) compartments with carbon electrodes, and uses acidic electrolytes (usually 3M H 2 SO 4 ). The carbon electrodes in VRFB need to perform in a harsh and corrosive environment associated with the charge/discharge cycling. In this study, we used polyacrylonitrile (PAN) based carbon papers as model carbon electrodes to study changes in the electrodes during cycling operation. The carbon papers were pre-treated according to the conventional approach by heating them in air at 500 ⁰C to incorporate oxygen functional groups on their surfaces. 2,3 These pre-treated electrodes were then used in flow battery for 100-cycles at a current density of 80 mA/cm 2 . At the single cell level, the performance of these electrodes following the operation indicated a slight decrease in voltage efficiency (from 60 % to 52 %). This decrease in performance may be attributed to the electrode degradation during operation. Characterization of the electrode prior and following 100-cycles was performed using Raman spectroscopy, XPS analysis as well as electrochemical studies. Raman analysis showed differences between the fresh and the degraded carbon electrodes, including increasing defect and electronic density distribution. XPS analysis of the degraded electrodes suggest an alteration in the amount of oxygen functional groups. Electrochemical studies showed an decrease in the electron transfer kinetics after degradation, coupled with noticeable difference between the electrodes exposed to the posolyte (VO 2 + /VO 2+ ) and negolyte (V 2+ /V 3+ ). The results provide insight into the stability of the oxygen functional groups during cycling operation which could assist in developing pre-treatment methods to functionalize the VRFB’s electrodes and for other similar electrochemical systems. References: (1) Soloveichik, G. L. Flow Batteries: Current Status and Trends. Chem. Rev. 2015 , 115 , 11533–11558. (2) Singh, A.; Yasri, N.; Karan, K.; Roberts, E. P. L. Electrocatalytic Activity of Functionalized Carbon Paper Electrodes and Their Correlation to the Fermi Level Derived from Raman Spectra. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2019 , acsaem.9b00180. (3) Singh, A. K.; Yasri, N.; Karan, K.; Roberts, E. P. L. Effect of Pretreatment on Carbon Materials. Meeting. Abstract. 2018 , MA2018 - 01 , 2391.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced battery technologies researchFrench-language works237,207