MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025805321 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-01512830mtgabs

Surface Engineering of Carbon Nanotubes with Inorganic-Organic Materials for Electrochemical Capacitors.

2020· article· en· W3025805321 on OpenAlexaff
Jeanne N’Diaye, Shaheer Siddiqui, Keryn Lian

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPseudocapacitanceMaterials scienceCarbon nanotubeSupercapacitorPseudocapacitorElectrochemistryElectrochemical windowNanotechnologyChemical engineeringRedoxElectrodeChemistryElectrolyteMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Composite electrodes comprised of inorganic-organic molecular materials are of great interest in applications such as electrochemical capacitors (ECs). ECs store and release charge via double layer capacitance (EDLC) or pseudocapacitance. The carbon materials used for EDLC has low capacitance, while pseudocapacitive materials such as redox active polymers or metal oxides have long term stability issues. Therefore, anchoring inorganic-organic materials on a carbon substrate can leverage the advantages of both EDLC and pseudocapacitance. Composite electrodes of kegging type polyoxometalates (POM) deposited on polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride (PDDA) via the layer-by-layer assembly has been well established and has shown great promise [1-3] . The issues are the limited operation window and the inert PDDA layer. Suitable alternatives that can complement the redox activity of POMs and enlarge the operating potential window are redox active polymers [4]. The objectives of this work are to: 1) develop and optimize an electroactive inorganic-organic composite electrode based on a carbon nanotube (CNT) substrate modified with polyluminol (CpLum) and H 5 GeMo 11 VO 40 .24H 2 O (GeMo 11 V); 2) study the electrochemical behavior of the composite electrode with and without PDDA for electrochemical capacitors; and 3) investigate the interactions between each layer. GeMo 11 V was first deposited onto CNT using PDDA as an anchor. The vanadium atom in the kegging structure provided an additional electrochemical redox peak with improved capacitive behavior on the cyclic voltammogram (CV) as seen in figure 1. First, CpLum, and GeMo 11 V were applied on CNT (CNT-CpLum-GeMo 11 V), then co-deposited with PDDA (CNT-CpLum-PDDA-GeMo 11 V). For both composite electrodes, CpLum and GeMo 11 V contributed to the redox activity leading to a wider potential window. The CV of CNT-CpLum-GeMo 11 V showed more reversible redox peaks with a slightly reduced GeMo 11 V contribution compared to CNT-CpLum-PDDA-GeMo 11 V that had a smoother CV shape. The decrease in GeMo 11 V contribution was attributed to the smaller amount of positive charge within the CpLum chain needed to anchor the GeMo 11 V. Each layer had a distinct role in the inorganic-organic composite electrode. The CpLum polymer added additional redox activity in the higher potential range, while PDDA attracted and held the GeMo 11 V, which provided redox activity in the lower potential range. All three layers had a synergistic interaction and provided enhanced charge storage properties with good rate capability and cycling stability. REFERENCES 1. M. Genovese, Y. W. Foong and K. Lian, Electrochimica Acta , 199 , 261 (2016). 2. M. Genovese and K. Lian, Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science , 19 , 126 (2015). 3. M. Genovese, Y. W. Foong and K. Lian, Journal of The Electrochemical Society , 162 , A5041 (2015). 4. N. Casado, G. Hernández, H. Sardon and D. Mecerreyes, Progress in Polymer Science , 52 , 107 (2016). Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.751

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicSupercapacitor Materials and FabricationFrench-language works237,207