MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025925799 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-01312324mtgabs

Nano-Optomechanical Systems (NOMS) for Gas Chromatography Sensing

2020· article· en· W3025925799 on OpenAlexaff
Wayne K. Hiebert, M. P. Maksymowych, Anandram Venkatasubramanian, Swapan K. Roy, Nadia Elhamel, Jocelyn N. Westwood‐Bachman, Tayyaba Firdous

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMechanical and Optical Resonators
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanoelectromechanical systemsDetectorOptomechanicsMechanical resonanceSensitivity (control systems)Resonance (particle physics)FinesseQ factorMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsCoupling (piping)Offset (computer science)ResonatorPhysicsOpticsAcousticsNanotechnologyVibrationComputer scienceFabry–Pérot interferometerElectronic engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nano-optomechanical systems (NOMS) achieve high-precision measurement of displacement which enables very high sensitivity through mechanical resonance-shift sensing. A recent breakthrough [1] has shown that NOMS devices can operate in high-damping environment without sacrificing their frequency stability and sensing resolution. This is because stability losses from lower quality factor ( Q ) are offset by stability gains from a larger intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio. We take advantage of this excellent stability to do atmospheric pressure resonant mechanical gas sensing with high sensitivity using NOMS [2]. In particular, we have set up a traditional gas chromatograph to output to a NOMS detector and shown parts-per-billion level detection [2]. By modifying the NOMS devices to make the silicon cantilevers porous, we have improved sensitivity by a further factor of 10 [3]. The next challenge, and opportunity, in using NOMS for mass sensing, is to separate the gas loading signals that affect both the mechanical and optical resonances in high optomechanical-coupling devices [4]. This is because, at high coupling, changes in optical resonance produce changes in mechanical resonance and vice versa. This effect can be used to amplify the sensing signal obtained when measuring mechanical frequency changes. In fact, it scales particularly well with high-finesse optical cavities and could lead to a situation where evanescent field gas loading on the optical cavity is transduced as a mechanical frequency shift with orders of magnitude better mass sensitivity than could be realized from the NEMS alone or the optical cavity alone. As an example, our present mass loading sensitivity is around 50 kDa [5]; improving the cavity linewidth merely by a factor of 10 should shrink that mass sensitivity by a factor of 1000, bringing it down to 50 Da. This level of sensitivity would allow studying chemical adsorption and desorption of individual gas chromatography molecules on the sensor surface and could provide a simple path for obtaining orthogonal information in gas chromatography detectors. [1] S. K. Roy, V. T. K. Sauer, J. N. Westwood-Bachman, A. Venkatasubramanian, and W. K. Hiebert, Improving mechanical sensor performance through larger damping. Science 360 , eaar5220 (2018); doi: 10.1126/science.aar5220. [2] A. Venkatasubramanian, et al., Nano-optomechanical systems for gas chromatography. Nano Lett. 16 , 6975-6981 (2016); doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03066. [3] A. Venkatasubramanian, et al., Porous nanophotonic optomechanical beams for enhanced mass adsorption. ACS sensors 4 , 1197-1202 (2018); doi: 10.1021/acssensors.8b01366. [4] M. P. Maksymowych, J. N. Westwood-Bachman, A. Venkatasubramanian, and W. K. Hiebert, Optomechanical spring enhanced mass sensing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 115 , 101103 (2019); doi: 10.1063/1.5117159 [5] Da = Dalton = 1 amu = 1 atomic mass unit ~ 1.66 x 10 -27 kg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.204
Threshold uncertainty score0.807

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicMechanical and Optical ResonatorsFrench-language works237,207