MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3025984163 · doi:10.1149/ma2020-014531mtgabs

Polypyrrole:Carboxymethyl Cellulose Composites As Efficient, Multifunctional Electrode Matrices for Lithium Battery Cathodes

2020· article· en· W3025984163 on OpenAlexaff
At Van Nguyen, Christian Kuß

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials sciencePolypyrroleCarboxymethyl celluloseComposite materialPEDOT:PSSConductive polymerComposite numberElectrodeCarbon blackChemical engineeringPolymerPolymerizationChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Even though the conventional electrode matrix PVDF/C-black is widely used in lithium batteries to provide adhesion and an electronically conducting matrix for active electrode materials, its performance as a binder is not sufficient for many high capacity materials, such as silicon and Lithium Nickel Manganese Cobalt Oxide. The problem is mainly attributed to the weak interactions between inert PVDF binder and non-polar carbon additives with active materials. As a result, PVDF/C cannot buffer volume changes of active materials during lithiation and delithiation that induce electrode cracking and side-reactions, leading to electrical-contact loss and capacity fading. To overcome these problems, several studies suggest the use of a multifunctional electrode matrix of conducting polymer composite PEDOT:PSS. However, the production cost of PEDOT:PSS prohibits its wide-scale application in battery technologies. In this research, we proposed a facile, scalable, low-cost in-situ polymerization method for an analogous polymer composite. We are demonstrating the fabrication of highly conductive, water-processable polypyrrole:carboxymethyl cellulose (PPy:CMC) composite as a new class of electrode matrix. The PPy:CMC (1:1 wt%) is formed at nano-level with a particle size of approximately 50 nm. The electrical conductivity of PPy:CMC (1:1 wt%) was found to be 144 mS/cm, which was smaller than that of pure PPy at approximately 1.73 S/cm, however was 10 times higher than that of ball-milled PPy:CMC (1:1 wt%) composite (mS/cm). This could be interpreted as the formation of a molecular-level composite, with ionic interactions between the positively charged polypyrrole and the negatively charged carboxyl groups on CMC. The presence of CMC in the composite structure also resulted in the ability to disperse the composite in water, which allows environmental friendly electrode processing. Thanks to the self-conductive feature of PPy:CMC composite, no additional conductive or binder additive is needed in the electrode. More importantly, we are targeting to reduce capacity degradation by improving adhesion between the conductive binder to active material particles. This study highlights how research into inactive materials can provide alternative inexpensive electrode matrices, widening the property space within which new active materials can be expected to operate. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicConducting polymers and applicationsFrench-language works237,207