Large oscillation of electrostatically actuated curved beams
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper investigates the responses of initially curved micro-beams subjected to an electrostatic excitation. A Euler–Bernoulli beam theory is utilized to derive the governing equation of motion. A reduced-order model was developed by discretizing the equation of motion using straight beam mode shapes as basis functions in a Galerkin expansion. The results show evidence of the superharmonic resonances of order-three and two in addition to primary resonance. The co-existence of multiple stable orbits observed around only one stable equilibrium and under excitation waveforms with RMS voltage less than the snap-back voltage. These branches are a branch of small orbits within a narrow potential well and two branches of medium-sized and large orbits within a wider potential well. The transition between them results in the characteristic of the double peaks appearing in the frequency-response curve. We also report a bubble structure along the medium-sized branch consists of a cascade of period-doubling bifurcations and a cascade of reverse period-doubling bifurcations. A chaotic attractor develops within that structure at larger excitation levels. It demonstrates evidence of chaos with a wide-based spectrum and an elevated noise-floor. Odd-periodic windows appear also within the attractor including period-three (P-3), period-five (P-5) and period-six (P-6) windows. The chaotic attractor terminates in a cascade of reverse period-doubling bifurcations of period-four (P-4) orbits and period-two (P-2) orbits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".