Growth of cardiac infants with post-surgical chylothorax can be supported using modified fat breast milk with proactive nutrient-enrichment and advancement feeding protocols; an open-label trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIM: Previously we showed that modified fat breast milk (MFBM) facilitated resolution of post-surgical chylothorax in cardiac infants, but their weight-for-age and length-for-age z-scores declined over the ≥6-week treatment duration. Our aim was to evaluate the growth of infants diagnosed with post-surgical chylothorax and fed according to one of two proactive feeding protocols using MFBM or a high medium triglyceride (MCT)-containing formula (standard of care). METHODS: In this open-label trial, infants who were receiving >50% of their enteral feeds as breast milk prior to chylothorax diagnosis were randomized to receive their enteral feeds according to one of two proactive MFBM protocols: Target Fortification (n = 8), where the protein concentration of defatted breast milk was measured weekly and multi- and single-nutrient modulars were added to provide 3.5 g/kg/day of protein; or Higher Initial Concentration (n = 8), where defatted breast milk was initially fortified to an energy and nutrient level higher than that of unmodified breast milk (80kcal/100 ml; 2.2 g/100 ml protein). A third nonrandomized group of infants (n = 8) received high MCT formula (68kcal/100 ml; 2.3 g/100 ml protein). The intervention lasted for a minimum of 6-weeks after chest tube removal and continued after discharge. Weekly weight, length and head circumference (HC) measurements were completed. RESULTS: At enrolment, there was no statistically significant differences in mean (±SD) weight-for-age (-1.6 ± 0.9, n = 24), length-for-age (-1.3 ± 0.8), or HC-for-age (-0.9 ± 1.0) z-scores among groups. Changes in mean weight- (-0.3 ± 0.9, n = 23), length- (0.1 ± 0.6) and HC-for-age (0.2 ± 0.6) z-scores did not differ among groups over the treatment period. There was no difference in duration or volume of chest tube drainage across groups. CONCLUSION: Use of proactive MFBM feeding protocols both resolve chylothorax and support growth in infants following cardiothoracic surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02577419).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".