Hot Extrusion of a Commercial Aluminum Powder Metallurgy Metal Matrix Composite Material
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Sintered preforms made of an aluminum powder metallurgy (PM) 2000 series metal matrix composite designed for press-and-sinter applications were forward extruded at 450°C under displacement rates of 254 mm/min and 2,032 mm/min. The material was highly responsive to extrusion under these conditions and was readily formed into products that included 10-mm and 15-mm solid round bars as well as C-channel and round tubing profiles, wherein extrusion ratios ranged from 11:1 to 76:1. Significant metallurgical improvements were also observed in the seemingly defect-free products. These included gains in tensile yield strength (10 %), ultimate tensile strength (20 %), and tensile ductility (400 %) when compared to the nonextruded T6 counterpart. Such enhancements were attributed to the attenuation of full theoretical density, disruption of the residual oxide network, and the development of a partial duplex fiber texture with strong <111> and moderate <100> fiber components within the extruded PM products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".