Religião, educação e política na trajetória intelectual do padre Paul-Eugène Charbonneau / Religion, education and politics in the intellectual trajectory of priest Paul-Eugène Charbonneau
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo aborda aspectos da trajetória do padre canadense Paul-Eugène Charbonneau, que atuou no Brasil, a partir de diferentes campos, intervindo na configuração da sociedade brasileira por meio da educação e da cultura. Com base na produção escrita deste intelectual, buscamos, neste artigo, apontar como a religião, a política e a educação estiveram presentes na trajetória intelectual do padre Charbonneau. Os conceitos de intelectual e elites culturais de Sirinelli (1998; 2003) e de trajetória, capital social, capital cultural e de campo de Bourdieu (2000; 2003; 2004; 2007) embasaram o aporte teórico do texto. Pensar a trajetória do intelectual Charbonneau permeada pelos campos da religião, educação e política, é perceber que a sua produção escrita não estava associada apenas à disseminação dos saberes educacionais com princípios católicos, mas trouxe discussões sobre o contexto político da época, ora trazendo elementos cristãos, ora incorporando o ator do político e cidadão brasileiro que se tornou.***This article approaches trajectory aspects of Canadian priest Paul-Eugène Charbonneau, who worked in Brazil, from different fields, intervening in the configuration of Brazilian society through education and culture. Based on the written production of this intellectual, we seek to point out how religion, politics and education were present in the intellectual trajectory of Father Charbonneau. Concepts like intellectual and cultural elites, by Sirinelli (1998, 2003), and Bourdieu's trajectory, social capital, cultural capital and field (2000, 2003, 2004, 2007) were the theoretical basis of this text. To think about the trajectory of intellectual Charbonneau, permeated by the fields of religion, education and politics, is to realize that his written production was not only associated with the dissemination of educational knowledge with Catholic principles, but brought discussions about the political context of the time, sometimes bringing Christian elements, sometimes incorporating the actor of the politician and Brazilian citizen hia had become.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".