Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Characterize chronic daily headache in those less than 20 years of age. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, observational, and sequential. SETTING: Private practice Pediatric Neurology Clinic in a Canadian city (Winnipeg). Patients and data collection: Data on those referred with headache between September 1998 and December 2001 were entered on data sheets. Patients were followed up for one month to four years. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-three (31%) of 463 referred with headache had chronic daily headache with duration of one month to five years (median: eight months). The age range was 5.5 years to 20 years (median: 13 years). There were significantly more females (N=93) than males (N=50). The main groups were: (1) transformed migraine: 6 (4%), (2) transformed tension-type headache: 80 (56%) and (3) transformed comorbid migraine and tension-type headache: 39 (27%). Tension-type features dominated in 94%. Analgesia overuse occurred in two. Stressors were recognized in 60 (42%); anxiety disorder was diagnosed in 8 (6%), and depression in 13 (9%). Computed tomography scans were done in 31 (22%), and MRI/MR angiography in 8 (6%) and were normal or showed nonspecific incidental findings. Twenty-two (15%) were lost to follow-up; 115 of the remaining 121 (95%) were headache free or greatly improved, 63 (55%) without specific treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic daily headache is a common headache disorder in children and adolescents, especially in teenage girls. A prospective neuropsychiatric approach is necessary for evidenced-based management, since the condition has mental health, social and economic ramifications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".