MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3026572903 · doi:10.1080/26410397.2020.1749341

Sexual and reproductive health among adolescent girls and young women in Mombasa, Kenya

2020· article· en· W3026572903 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSexual and Reproductive Health Matters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSex work and related issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsReproductive healthCasualMedicinePsychological interventionAbortionTransactional sexFamily planningPregnancyFamily medicineDemographyEnvironmental healthPopulationNursingPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This secondary data analysis of a cross-sectional survey conducted in Mombasa, Kenya characterises sexual and reproductive health (SRH) indicators among adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) engaged in casual and transactional sexual relationships as well as sex work. It describes the association between awareness of local HIV programmes and SRH services uptake for AGYW engaged in sex work. Thirty-eight percent of the participants reported a history of pregnancy. Among participants not trying to get pregnant, 27% stated that they were not currently using any form of contraception. Of the participants who had an abortion, 59% were completed under unsafe conditions. For AGYW engaged in sex work, awareness of local HIV prevention programmes was associated with increased STI testing within the last year (29%) as well as at least one HIV test (99%) compared to those who were not aware of local programming (18% and 92%, respectively); however, only 26% of participants engaged in sex work had heard of local HIV prevention programmes. There were no associations between awareness of local HIV programming and rates of dual contraception use, safe abortion, most recent birth attended by a skilled health professional or testing for HIV during pregnancy. Our study found high need for SRH services, particularly, access to contraception and safe abortion. Continued efforts are required to improve access to the full spectrum of SRH interventions, including family planning services and access to safe abortion in addition to HIV prevention to promote health equity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it