Subterahertz refractive flat-top beam shaping via 3D printed aspheric lens combination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The viability of 3D printed aspheric lenses for the purpose of frequency-scalable subterahertz Gaussian to flat-top beam shaping is evaluated. A cylindrical one-dimensional Fresnel–Kirchhoff diffraction equation was implemented in Matlab and used to design a pair of aspheric lenses with customized vertex radius of curvature and conic constant. The lenses were printed at maximum possible resolution in acrylonitrile butadiene styrene ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>n</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1.6</mml:mn> </mml:math> ) and tested with a 102 GHz continuous-wave subterahertz source. The aspheric lens combination produced a flat-top profile from a low-quality incident Gaussian beam at the minimal cost of 3D printing substrate. The flat-top profile exhibited small ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo><</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mn>14</mml:mn> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi> </mml:math> root-mean-square deviation over a flat region) intensity fluctuations and is expected to prove useful in future terahertz applications that require a high degree of beam uniformity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".