Definition and Application of Variable Resistance Coefficient for Wheeled Mobile Robots on Deformable Terrain
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resistance coefficient (RC) is an important measure when designing wheel-driving mechanisms and accurate dynamic models for real-time mobility control of wheeled mobile robots (WMRs). This measure is typically formulated as a constant that depends on the wheel load, wheel dimensions, and soil that the WMR is designed for. This article proposes a novel variable RC that responds to terrain deformation. This variable RC is then applied to controllers for WMRs that estimate driving torques and slip ratios on deformable terrain. Simple yet accurate models of RC are developed from both experimental results and theoretical analysis, and these models are then compared with other methods. The proposed RC models give more accurate and more computationally efficient estimations of driving torques and slip ratios for WMRs, with average estimation errors less than 6% and the shortest computation time in experiments. The two proposed estimators are then applied to the design of the tracking-control systems for a WMR running on deformable terrain. Experiments with simulated sandy terrain demonstrate that both proposed control systems are feasible, and the slip estimation effectively decreases velocity tracking errors from more than 20% to less than 10%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it