Definition and Application of Variable Resistance Coefficient for Wheeled Mobile Robots on Deformable Terrain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resistance coefficient (RC) is an important measure when designing wheel-driving mechanisms and accurate dynamic models for real-time mobility control of wheeled mobile robots (WMRs). This measure is typically formulated as a constant that depends on the wheel load, wheel dimensions, and soil that the WMR is designed for. This article proposes a novel variable RC that responds to terrain deformation. This variable RC is then applied to controllers for WMRs that estimate driving torques and slip ratios on deformable terrain. Simple yet accurate models of RC are developed from both experimental results and theoretical analysis, and these models are then compared with other methods. The proposed RC models give more accurate and more computationally efficient estimations of driving torques and slip ratios for WMRs, with average estimation errors less than 6% and the shortest computation time in experiments. The two proposed estimators are then applied to the design of the tracking-control systems for a WMR running on deformable terrain. Experiments with simulated sandy terrain demonstrate that both proposed control systems are feasible, and the slip estimation effectively decreases velocity tracking errors from more than 20% to less than 10%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".