MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3026920194 · doi:10.5194/tc-2020-119

Meltwater Storage in the firn of Kaskawulsh Glacier, Yukon Territory, Canada

2020· article· en· W3026920194 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Naomi Ochwat, Shawn J. Marshall, Brian J. Moorman, Alison S. Criscitiello, Luke Copland

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersU.S. Geological SurveyParks CanadaPolar Knowledge CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaArctic Institute of North America
KeywordsFirnMeltwaterGlacierGeologyAccumulation zoneIce coreArcticPhysical geographyIce sheetGlacier mass balanceSnowGeomorphologyClimatologyOceanographyCryosphereIce streamSea iceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. In recent years, the analysis of firn in Greenland, Svalbard, and other high Arctic regions has contributed to the understanding of meltwater retention in firn and its importance to measurements of glacier mass balance. This has provided insight into firn densification processes and meltwater retention. Changes in these attributes can also provide insight into meteorological variability and climate trends. In spring 2018, two firn cores (21 m and 36 m in length) were extracted from the accumulation zone of Kaskawulsh Glacier, St. Elias Mountains, Yukon. The cores were analyzed for ice layer stratigraphy, density, and glaciochemical time series (oxygen isotopes and major ions). Meltwater percolation and refreezing events were evident in the cores. The quantity of ice layers, the presence of liquid water at 34.5 m depth, interpreted as a perennial firn aquifer (PFA), and the altered isotopic and glaciochemical signature all indicate this process. This melt resulted in an estimated surface lowering of 10 ± 0.8 cm/yr between 2005 and 2018. The information gleaned from Kaskawulsh Glacier supports the need for improved and field-validated density assumptions for geodetic mass balance methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.046
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→