REAKTUALISASI UNDANG-UNDANG JABATAN NOTARIS TERKAIT DIGITALISASI MINUTA AKTA OLEH NOTARIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Notary deed can be used as written evidence in court (civil and criminal). The notary then saves the deed as a million deed which is part of the notary protocol. The principle of prudence is needed by the Notary in saving the deed of minuta until the Notary retires. However, the reality is that the minutta deed is often scattered because of many things, such as changing positions, lack of employee responsibility, or coercing majors. In fact, UUJN does not regulate the completion of damaged or missing minuta. The purpose of this paper is to determine the position of the notary deed as evidence (civil and criminal) and analyze the need for the actualization of UUJN related to digitalization of the deed of minutes by the notary public. Research results and conclusions are; First, the position of the notary deed as evidence in criminal cases (only limited to the strength of evidence) and civil (strength of birth, formal, and material evidence). Second, the need for the actualization of UUJN related to digitalization of notary deed by a notary because it has economic and legal benefits. Keywords: notary; minuta; deed; UUJN; digitization Abstrak Akta notaril yang dibuat oleh notaris dapat dijadikan sebagai alat bukti tertulis di persidangan (perdata maupun pidana). Notaris dalam hal ini kemudian menyimpan akta sebagai minuta akta yang merupakan bagian dari protokol notaris. Prinsip kehati-hatian sangat diperlukan oleh Notaris dalam menyimpan minuta akta sampai Notaris dinyatakan pensiun. Namun, kenyataannya seringkali minuta akta tercecer disebabkan banyak hal, seperti kantor berpindah, kurang bertanggungjawabnya karyawan kantor Notaris, kebakaran dan bencana alam (force majour). Kenyataannya, UUJN tidak mengatur mengenai penyelesaian minuta akta yang rusak atau hilang. Tujuan dari penulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui kedudukan akta notaris sebagai alat bukti (perkara perdata maupun pidana) dan menganalisis perlunya reaktualisasi UUJN terkait digitalisasi minuta akta oleh notaris. Hasil penelitian dan kesimpulan dari penulisan ini adalah; pertama, kedudukan akta notaris sebagai alat bukti dalam perkara pidana (hanya sebatas kekuatan pembuktian) dan perdata (kekuatan pembuktian lahir, formil, dan materiil). Kedua, perlunya reaktualisasi UUJN terkait digitalisasi minuta akta oleh notaris dikarenakan secara ekonomis, penyimpanan protokol notaris bertujuan agar lebih efisien, mudah, dan lain sebagainya. Sedangkan ditinjau dari aspek hukumnya, dapat membantu dan memudahkan dalam proses hukum terutama hukum pembuktian yang berkaitan dengan alat bukti elektronik. Kata kunci : notaris; minuta; akta; UUJN; digitalisasi
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".