MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3027259369 · doi:10.3233/jad-200053

Impacts of Kidney Dysfunction and Cerebral Cortical Thinning on Cognitive Change in Elderly Population

2020· article· en· W3027259369 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chih‐Hao Chen, Ya‐Fang Chen, Ping‐Huan Tsai, Jeng‐Min Chiou, Liang‐Chuan Lai, Ta‐Fu Chen, Hung Hung, Jen‐Hau Chen, Yen‐Ching Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Alzheimer s Disease · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive declineCognitionVerbal fluency testMedicineHyperintensityPsychologyMagnetic resonance imagingInternal medicineCardiologyNeuroscienceDementiaNeuropsychologyRadiologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cerebral cortical thickness is a neuroimaging biomarker to predict cognitive decline, and kidney dysfunction (KD) is associated with cortical thinning. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of KD and cortical thinning on cognitive change in a prospective cohort study. METHODS: A total of 244 non-demented participants were recruited from elderly health checkup program and received cognitive exams including Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and different cognitive domains at baseline and three biannual follow-ups afterwards. KD was defined as having either glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 or proteinuria. Cortical thickness of global, lobar, and Alzheimer's disease (AD) signature area were derived from magnetic resonance imaging at baseline, and cortical thinning was defined as the lowest tertile of cortical thickness. Generalized linear mixed models were applied to evaluate the effects of KD and cortical thinning on cognitive changes. RESULTS: KD was significantly associated with the decline in attention function (β= -0.29). Thinning of global (β= -0.06), AD signature area (β= -0.06), temporal (β= -0.06), and parietal lobes (β= -0.06) predicted poor verbal fluency over time, while temporal lobe thinning also predicted poor MoCA score (β= -0.19). KD modified the relationship between thinning of global, frontal, and limbic, and change of logical memory function (pinteraction < 0.05). When considering jointly, participants with both KD and cortical thinning had greatest decline in attention function compared with those without KD or cortical thinning (β= -0.51, ptrend = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: KD and cortical thinning have joint effect on cognitive decline, especially the attention function. Reverse associations may exist between cortical thinning and memory function in participants with KD, though the results should be interpreted cautiously as an exploratory analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Alzheimer s DiseaseSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207