Superficial and deep zone articular chondrocytes exhibit differences in actin polymerization status and actin-associated molecules in vitro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The actin cytoskeleton regulates cell shape and plays a role in regulating chondrocyte phenotype. Most studies investigating regulation of the chondrocyte phenotype by the actin cytoskeleton use chondrocytes isolated from full-thickness (FT) cartilage, which has a heterogeneous cell population. Superficial zone chondrocytes (SZC) have an elongated morphology and account for 10–20% of chondrocytes, while the remaining chondrocytes in the deeper zones appear more rounded. This study characterizes the actin cytoskeleton and expression of actin-associated molecules in SZC and deep zone (DZ) chondrocytes (DZC) in vitro in order to identify molecules differentially expressed by SZC and DZC that may contribute to the observed differences in zonal chondrocyte shapes. SZ, DZ, and FT chondrocytes isolated from bovine metacarpal-phalangeal joints were cultured in monolayer for 48 h. Macroscopic morphology, actin polymerization status, and expression of select actin-associated molecules (adseverin, cofilin, transgelin, vinculin, MRTF-A, and YAP/TAZ) were determined. SZC appeared more elongated and have more filamentous actin compared to DZC, as determined by quantifying cell circularity and G-/F-actin ratio. MRTF-A gene and protein levels were significantly higher in SZC compared to DZC while DZC more highly expressed transgelin and TAZ. Although there was differential gene expression, no significant differences in adseverin, cofilin, vinculin, or YAP protein levels were observed between the two cell populations. This study identifies differences in actin polymerization status and expression of actin-associated molecules in primary SZC and DZC in vitro. These findings further our understanding of candidate actin-related pathways that may be regulating zonal chondrocyte phenotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".