MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

POD-Galerkin reduced order methods for inverse and multi-physics problems in fluid dynamics

2018· article· en· W3028035558 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Monica Nonino, Maria Strazzullo, Zakia Zainib, Francesco Ballarin, Gianluigi Rozza

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeEuropean Commission
KeywordsOptimal controlModel order reductionComputer scienceGeophysical fluid dynamicsGalerkin methodFluid dynamicsOperations researchManagement scienceApplied mathematicsGeographyEngineeringMathematicsMeteorologyMathematical optimizationPhysicsFinite element methodAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work we will focus on recent advances in reduced order modelling for parametrized problems in computational fluid dynamics, with a special attention to the case of inverse problems, such as optimal flow control problems and data assimilation, and multi-physics applications. Among the former, we will discuss applications arising in environmental marine sciences and engineering, namely a pollutant control in the Gulf of Trieste, Italy and a solution tracking governed by quasi-geostrophic equations describing North Atlantic Ocean dynamic. Similar methodologies will also be employed in problems related to the modeling of the cardiovascular system. Among the latter, we will present further recent developments on reduction of fluid-structure interaction problems, based on our earlier work. Reduced order approaches for parametric optimal flow control will also be applied in combination with domain decomposition in view of further applications in multi-physics. This work is in collaboration with Y. Maday (UPMC Université Paris 06, France), L. Jiménez-Juan (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada), P. Triverio (University of Toronto, Canada), R. Mosetti (National Institute of Oceanography and Applied Geophysics, Trieste, Italy).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207