Nutrient composition of Chinese oak silkworm,Antheraea pernyi, a traditional edible insect in China: a review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Edible insects are considered to be rich in protein and several micronutrients; therefore, they are regarded as one of the potential contributors to food security. The Chinese oak silkworm, Antheraea pernyi (Guérin-Méneville, 1855), has been collected from oak trees in the wild for at least 2,000 years, and Chinese farmers developed the artificial rearing of Chinese oak silkworms for silk production before the 17 th century. Recently, about 5×10 4 t of A. pernyi , including the fifth-instar larvae, pupae and moths, has been reported to be consumed as food in China per year. A total of 18 amino acids, 16 fatty acids, 13 minerals, 5 vitamins and 7 human hormones have been detected in the larvae, pupae and adult moths of A. pernyi . In this review, we have summarised the complete nutrient composition in the four developmental stages of this economically important insect. All available data suggest that the Chinese oak silkworm is nutritionally rich and healthy and a sustainable food item of the future. This review could provide a podium to the food and animal feed industry for framing a strategy for the intake of A. pernyi in the diets of humans and animals. Moreover, this paper would contribute to advancing the exploration of the developmental and the metabolic biology of the Chinese oak silkworm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it