MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028204747 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbaa029.564

T4. SIGNIFICANT, PROLONGED HYPERGLYCEMIA IN AN 18-YEAR-OLD TYPE 1 DIABETIC PATIENT POST INITIATION OF ARIPIPRAZOLE: A CASE REPORT

2020· article· en· W3028204747 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew H. Dick, Sarah Mamane

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAripiprazoleMedicineDiabetic ketoacidosisAntipsychoticAtypical antipsychoticSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Diabetes mellitusAdverse effectAkathisiaInternal medicineClozapinePerphenazineAnesthesiaPediatricsEndocrinologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Current schizophrenia guidelines recommend that the choice of antipsychotic be made by the patient and physician together with a discussion of the likely benefits and side effects of each medication. Second-generation antipsychotics are commonly prescribed for the treatment of psychotic disorders, however metabolic adverse effects, such as hyperglycemia, are a potential complication of using this class of medications. Current sources indicate that the second-generation antipsychotic aripiprazole does not alter glucose homeostasis and confers low or no risk of developing diabetes. Below, the authors outline a case of significant, prolonged hyperglycemia secondary to the initiation of oral aripiprazole. Methods See Results. Results Case: An 18-year-old female was admitted involuntarily to hospital after she presented with suicidal ideation, ideas of reference, persecutory delusions and paranoia. She was reportedly a well-controlled Type 1 Diabetic prior to admission and her blood sugars were within normal limits for the first 9 days of hospitalization. Aripiprazole 10mg PO QAM was initiated to control symptoms. Within 9 hours of aripiprazole initiation, her blood sugars became unexpectedly and significantly elevated. After 5 days of therapy, aripiprazole was discontinued due to an inability to adequately control blood glucose. Diabetic ketoacidosis and pancreatitis were ruled out as laboratory results showed normal ketones, amylase and lipase. Blood glucose was taken via the Freestyle Libra device which measures interstitial fluid glucose levels and re-checked using the Accu-Chek Inform II monitor which is approved for use with capillary, venous, and arterial blood. Monitoring device malfunction was thereby ruled out as a cause. Diet and insulin administration techniques were closely monitored by nursing staff. Endocrinology and clinical dietary services were consulted. At their peak, blood sugars were as high as 25.9 mmol/L despite an increase in patient’s daily insulin (total bolus and basal) from 19 units/day to 132 units/day. Patient’s blood sugar and insulin requirements remained elevated over the next 17 days before gradually decreasing and returning to baseline. Discussion In this case, the authors are of the opinion that the patient experienced a severe idiosyncratic reaction to aripiprazole manifesting as severe hyperglycemia. Aripiprazole’s half-life of elimination is 75 hours, and dehydro-aripiprazole (Aripiprazole’s active metabolite) is 94 hours; the amount of time for the drug to be essentially removed from the body is 15.6 days and 19.6 days respectively (5 half-lives). This is consistent with the duration of time that passed before blood glucose levels normalized once aripiprazole was discontinued. The manufacturer of aripiprazole (Otsuka) has data regarding increases in blood glucose in adolescents. However, these increases are over a 26 week time frame, occurred in 1.9% of patients, and had a mean increase of 0.12mmol/L in their fasting glucose. This data, and the results of this case, therefore suggest that although increases of blood glucose while on aripiprazole tend to be rare and modest, there may be a subcategory of patients who develop severe hyperglycemia on this medication, and when this severe adverse effect is noted, the provocative agent should be promptly discontinued to reverse the effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.201
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicDiabetes Management and ResearchFrench-language works237,207