COX-1 – lipid interactions: arachidonic acid, cholesterol, and phospholipid binding to the membrane binding domain of COX-1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cyclooxygenases carry out the committed step in prostaglandin synthesis and are the target of NSAIDs, the most widely used class of drugs in alleviating pain, fever, and inflammation. While extensively studied, one aspect of their biology that has been neglected is their interaction with membrane lipids. Such lipid-protein interactions have been shown to be a driving force behind membrane protein function and activity. Cyclooxygenases (COX-1 and COX-2) are bound on the luminal side of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. The entrance to their active site is formed by a long hydrophobic channel which is used by the cyclooxygenase natural substrate, arachidonic acid, to access the enzyme. Using atomistic and coarse-grained simulations, we show that several membrane lipids are capable of accessing the same hydrophobic channel. We observe the preferential binding of arachidonic acid, cholesterol and glycerophospholipids with residues lining the cavity of the channel. We find that the membrane binding domain (MBD) of COX-1 is usually in a lipid-bound state and not empty. This orthosteric binding by other lipids suggests a potential regulatory role of membrane lipids with the possibility of affecting the COX-1 turnover rate. We also observed the unbiased binding of arachidonic acid to the MBD of COX-1 allowing us to clearly delineate its binding pathway. We identified a series of arginine residues as being responsible for guiding arachidonic acid towards the binding site. Finally, we were also able to identify the mechanism by which COX-1 induces a positive curvature on the membrane environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".