T104. PSYCHOTIC-LIKE EXPERIENCES AND PROBLEMATIC GAMING BEHAVIOR IN ONLINE GAME FORUMS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Psychotic-like experiences (PLE) are reported in the general population, characterizing a non-clinical psychosis phenotype. Although those who report PLE have a higher probability of transitioning to psychosis, PLE are usually a transitory state, and most individuals will not transition to psychosis. However, PLE samples may experience symptoms such as social withdrawal, social anxiety, or social anhedonia. These symptoms may lead individuals with PLE to choose online gaming as a preferred means of social interaction. Objective This study aims to examine the relation between PLE and problematic online gaming. Methods An online questionnaire was posted in online game forums, on online fan-pages with German-speaking domains and in social media groups. Data from adolescents and young adults (14 to 30 years old; 55.4% males) from Austria and Germany (N=280) was analyzed. Measures: PLE were assessed with the Early Recognition Inventory based on the Interview for the Retrospective Assessment of the Onset of Schizophrenia (ERIraos); problematic gaming behavior was assessed with the Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS) adapted for online gaming; social anxiety was assessed with the Mini-Social Phobia Inventory (Mini-SPIN); preference for online social interactions was assessed with the Preference for Online Social Interaction scale (POSI). Analyses: Problematic gaming behavior was divided into two groups based on the suggested cut-off point of ≥18 on the CIUS (i.e., ≥18 gaming disorder vs. ˂18 no gaming disorder). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed and adjusted for sex, age, gaming hours, POSI, and social anxiety. Results A total of 63 individuals reached the cutoff for a gaming disorder, while 217 did not reach the cutoff. The majority of subjects in the gaming disorder group were males, young adults (19–24 years old, M=23.1, SD=3.7), single, or had less than high school diploma. Individuals who experienced an increased amount of PLE had a higher probability of reaching the cut-off for a gaming disorder (AOR=1.35 [95% CI 1.19–1.53]). Males were three times as likely as females to have a gaming disorder. Discussion Results implicate a close relation between the phenomena of PLE and continued problematic gaming behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".