The Effect of Entrepreneurship on the Sustainability of Social Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) - Between the Mediating Effects of Government Support Policy in Korea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study aims to study the impact of the entrepreneurial mentality of social small and medium-sized entrepreneurs on the sustainability of SMEs through the intermediary effect of the Korean government-backed policy for social enterprises in South Korea.Methods/Statistical analysis: The target of the study is the CEO of a social small and medium-sized business company that has been in business for less than seven years, and the survey method was conducted. The questionnaire item was composed of a total of 35 questions, including five demographic questions, the measurement was used for a Likert 5-point scale. Using SPSS 22.0 as an empirical analysis was carried out technical statistical analysis, exploratory factor analysis, reliability analysis, regression analysis, mediated analysis.Findings: Looking at the results of the study, first, the empathy, social value orientation, and innovation of the entrepreneurial spirit of social start-ups have been shown to affect the sustainability of social SMEs. Social value orientation has the greatest impact (β = .345***). Second, Empathy, Social value orientation, and Innovation have been shown to influence government policy support, but risk-taking has not been affected. Social value orientation has the greatest impact (β= .459***). Third, the Republic of Korea Government Support Policy has been shown to have an impact on sustainability (β= .751***). Fourth, about the impact of Social SMEs Entrepreneurship and sustainability, innovation and Risk-taking is partly mediated by Government Support Policy, while Empathy (p=.158) and Social value orientation (p=.148) was found to be a complete mediating.Improvements/Applications: In this study, which mediated government-funded policies on the impact of the entrepreneurial mentality of the CEO of a Social SMB, empathy and Social value orientation were identified as important factors. Therefore, it is believed that a study will be needed on the optimal configuration scenario of the Government Policy Support System of the Republic of Korea, which takes into account social entrepreneurship.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".