MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028356525 · doi:10.34194/ggub.v190.5174

The eudialyte group: a review

2001· review· en· W3028356525 on OpenAlexaff
O. Johnsen, Joel D. Grice, R. A. Gault

Bibliographic record

VenueGeology of Greenland Survey Bulletin · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicChemical Synthesis and Characterization
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystallographyGroup (periodic table)Trigonal crystal systemChemistryCrystal structure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The eudialyte group of complex Na, Ca, Zr silicates encompasses a wide range of compositions in which all the main elements Si, Zr, Ca, Fe and Na vary, and many relatively minor elements such as Mn, REE, Sr Nb, K, Y and Ti are present. For most members of the group the empirical formula is Na15[M(1)]6[M(2)]3Zr3[M(3)](Si25O73)(O,OH,H2O)3(Cl,F,OH)2 and the best method of formula calculation is on the basis of 29 (Si, Al, Zr Ti, Hf, Nb, W, Ta) apfu (Z = 3), which are the elements assigned to the Zr, M(3) and all Si sites in the structure. The commonest substitutions are found with the solid solution series eudialyte sensu stricto (enriched in Si, Ca, Fe and Cl) and kentbrooksite (enriched in Nb, REE, Mn and F), but recent studies show that the series extends beyond kentbrooksite to an exceptionally Ca-deficient eudialyte now named oneillite. Most eudialytes are trigonal R3m or R3m but oneillite is R3. Additional members of the group are khomyakovite and manganokhomyakovite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeology of Greenland Survey BulletinSame topicChemical Synthesis and CharacterizationFrench-language works237,207