MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028486192 · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbaa031.080

S14. ANALYSIS OF METHYLATION AGE AND BLOOD CELL COMPOSITION IN SUBJECTS WITH CURRENT SUICIDE IDEATION

2020· article· en· W3028486192 on OpenAlexaff
Oluwagbenga Dada, Vincenzo De Luca, Ali Bani‐Fatemi

Bibliographic record

VenueSchizophrenia Bulletin · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsdNaMDNA methylationEpigeneticsPopulationSuicidal ideationSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Suicide attemptMethylationPsychologyClinical psychologyMedicineOncologyBioinformaticsPsychiatryPoison controlBiologyGeneticsInjury preventionGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Suicidal Ideation (SI) remain an important and common risk factor affecting people with SCZ, who eventually attempt or complete suicide. Then the question is, what if factors (such as stressful life events and related molecular biomarkers) known to be involved in the aetiology of SCZ could help in predicting SI in this population? The accelerated aging hypothesis of SCZ posits that physiological changes associated with normal aging occur at an earlier age in individuals with SCZ than in the general population. Importantly, epigenetic changes may constitute an important component of aging process. Based on this, the chronological age can be predicted by the epigenetic clock in a highly consistent manner. The aims of this research were to determine the effect chronological and biological age on current SI and secondly, to determine the effect of the variation of cellular blood cell composition on current SI. Methods A total of 103 participants with a DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders were recruited from the Center of Addiction and Mental Health. The SI was assessed by the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis was generated from whole blood cells. The DNA methylation was assessed using the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 Bead Chip while the DNA methylation-based age prediction and white blood cell composition were performed using the statistical pipeline developed by Horvath. Results Out of 103 participants, 18 had current SI (17%) while 85 had NSI. The DNAm age correlated with chronological age in the overall sample (r=0.814, p<0.0001), NSI (r=0.823, p<0.0001) and SI subjects (r=0.734, p=0.001). The strong linear relationship between DNAm age and chronological age showed a high accuracy of the epigenetic clock. However, DNAm age acceleration residuals did not differ between NSI and SI groups (t=1.532, p= 0.129). Comparison of the cellular cell blood composition between the NSI and SI groups indicated no significant differences between the NSI and SI groups (lymphocytes (t= -0.338, p=0.736), monocytes (t=-1.405, p=0.163) and granulocytes (t=0.924, p=0.358)). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the SI and NSI groups in the analysis of the plasmablast (t=0.138, p=0.890), CD4 naïve (t=0.010, p=0.992) and CD8 naïve (t=0.681, p=0.497) Discussion Stressful life events may change DNA methylation, which in turn can affect suicide ideation and suicidal behavior. Although SCZ is associated with age-related physiological factors, we were unable to find accelerated aging in our study. Nevertheless, we cannot rule out the possibility of other aging mechanism independent of epigenetic aging in SCZ patients. Conclusion: Further studies aimed at investigating the accelerated aging hypothesis in peripheral tissue are warranted to identify individuals with SCZ at risk for suicide. This will permit a tailored treatment and will prevent suicide in SCZ individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSchizophrenia BulletinSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207