Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a new filter referred to as the sliding innovation filter (SIF) is presented. The SIF is an estimation strategy formulated as a predictor-corrector that makes use of a switching gain and innovation term. In estimation theory, a trade-off exists between robustness to disturbances and optimality in terms of estimation error. Unlike the Kalman filter (KF), the SIF is a sub-optimal filter in the sense that it does not provide the optimal solution to the linear estimation problem. However, the switching gain provides an inherent amount of robustness to estimation problems that may be ill-conditioned or contain modeling uncertainties and disturbances. The paper includes the proof of stability and explanation of the SIF gain. Furthermore, the SIF is extended to nonlinear estimation problems using a Jacobian matrix, resulting in the extended sliding innovation filter (ESIF). The methods are applied to a linear and nonlinear aerospace actuator system under the presence of a leakage fault. The results of the simulation demonstrate the improved performance of the SIF and ESIF strategies over popular KF-based methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it