Cervicalspondylotic radiculopathy treated with Xianlinggubao capsules, Mecobalamin tablets, manipulation and cervical traction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To observe the curative effect of Xianlinggubao capsules combined with mecobalamin tablets, manipulation and cervical traction in treatment of cervicalspondylotic radiculopathy(CSR). Methods Forty-eight cases CSR patients who were treated in Affiliated Hospital of North China University of Science and Technology from February 2013 to May 2015 were randomly divided into treatment group and control group, each group with 24 cases.All patients were treated with manipulation, cervical traction and mecobalamin tablets(0.5 mg, 3 times/d), treatment group received Xianlinggubao capsule(1.5 g, 2 times/d) for 21 d. Nervous pain was valued with short-form of McGill questionnaire(SF-MPQ), the difference between the two groups before and after treatment was compared with that before treatment, the pain rating index(PRI), the fuzzy pain rating scale(VAS) and the current degree of pain(PPI). Table 20 quantitative analysis of symptoms of cervical spondylosis of nerve root type was applied to assess the comprehensive evaluation of symptoms and signs, the curative effect was calculate(before and after treatment, and the ratio of the integral before treatment) of the omnibus symptoms and signs.The curative ratio and the healing time were calculated. Results The treatment group McGill in PRI, VAS and PPI score difference were significantly higher than the control group((6.16±1.94) points vs (4.87±2.12) points, (5.23±2.22) points vs.(3.63±1.74) points, (2.76±0.87) points vs.(1.26±1.01) points), the differences were statistically significant(P=0.02, 0.03, 0.04). Table 20 quantitative analysis index of treatment was significant higher than control group(0.72±0.15 vs.0.37±0.07), the differences were statistically significant(t=1.31, P<0.05). The curative ratio of treatment group was much higher in control group(70.83%(17/24) vs.45.83%(11/24)), the differences were statistically significant(χ2=8.15, P=0.02). The treatment group gained shorter healing time((8.31±3.11) d vs.(11.24±4.52) d, t=3.36, P=0.01). Conclusion Assured curative effect was found in Xianlinggubao capsules combined with mecobalamin tablets, manipulation and cervical traction for cervicalspondylotic radiculopathy. Key words: Cervicalspondylotic radiculopathy; Xianlinggubao capsules; Mecobalamin; Manipulation; ervical traction
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".