Is the toxicity of breast radiotherapy higher in patients with collagen vascular disease? A systematic review of the literature.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e12527 Background: Collagen vascular disease (CVD) has been described to be a relative contraindication for radiotherapy (RT) due to increased toxicity. As a result, RT to the breast or chest wall is underutilized in patients with CVD, despite known benefits in local control and overall survival after breast conserving surgery or mastectomy. We sought to characterize the acute and late toxicity rates associated with curative-intent RT for breast cancer patients with CVD. Methods: A systematic review per the PRISMA guidelines was performed using Pubmed database (inception to July 2019), for English-language articles. Key search themes included collagen vascular disease, connective tissue disease, including specific subtypes, along with terms for radiation and cancer. Title and abstract review were followed by full-text review. Inclusion criteria were reports of toxicity of five or more patients with CVD and treatment with curative-intent RT to the breast or chest wall. Data abstracted included: type of study, CVD diagnosis, number of patients who received breast RT, acute grade ≥3, and late grade ≥1, grade ≥3, and grade 5 toxicity. Primary endpoint was late grade ≥3 toxicity for patients with pre-existing CVD. Acute and late toxicity were classified as per CTCAE version 5.0. Results: The initial search yielded 3286 unique abstracts. 34 articles were determined appropriate for full-text review. From these, a final set of 10 articles met all inclusion criteria. All studies were retrospective. In these studies, more than 30 000 patient cases were reported. 184 patients with CVD who underwent curative-intent RT to the breast or chest wall and had available toxicity data were identified, including 128 patients with CVD diagnosed before RT. In the 5 case control studies, 100 patients were matched to 225 controls. Most studies did not report the incidence of all grades of toxicity. Among patients with available data, 7/102 patients (7%) with pre-existing CVD had late grade ≥3 toxicity, including 4/6 (67%) with pre-existing scleroderma and 3/96 (3%) with pre-existing non-scleroderma CVD. 32/88 patients (36%) with pre-existing CVD and available data had late grade ≥1 toxicity. 1/142 (1%) had late grade 5 toxicity, in the form of chronic pericarditis. 6/66 patients (11%) with pre-existing CVD had acute grade ≥3 radiation dermatitis. No patients had acute grade 5 toxicity. Conclusions: Retrospective data suggest that patients with pre-existing CVD, aside from scleroderma, have acceptable acute and late toxicity rates after RT to the breast or chest wall.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.027 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.012 | 0.014 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".