MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effects of hyperbaric oxygen combined with Oxiracetam on cognitive function and related cytokines in patients after brain trauma

2019· article· en· W3028820170 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yong-Nan Wang, Jie Yin

Bibliographic record

VenueChin J Neurotrauma Surg(Electronic Edition) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperbaric oxygenMedicineBrain-derived neurotrophic factorVascular endothelial growth factorMontreal Cognitive AssessmentAnesthesiaNeurotrophic factorsInternal medicineTreatment and control groupsCognitionCognitive impairmentVEGF receptorsPsychiatryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To investigate the effect of hyperbaric oxygen combined with Oxiracetam on cognitive function and related cytokines in patients with post-traumatic cognitive impairment. Methods Sixty patients with post-traumatic cognitive impairment hospitalized from January 2017 to October 2018 in neurosurgery department of Xuzhou Central Hospital were randomly divided into control group and treatment group, 30 cases in each group. The control group received conventional routine treatment, and the treatment group was treated with hyperbaric oxygen combined with Oxiracetam on the basis of routine treatment. The course of treatment is 3 weeks. The concentration of angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were measured, and the Chinese version of the Monterey’s cognitive-score scale (MOCA) was used to evaluate the cognitive functions before treatment and 3 weeks after treatment. Results Before treatment there was no significant difference in the levels of Ang-1, VEGF and BDNF between the two groups (P>0.05). After 3 weeks of treatment, the serum levels of Ang-1, VEGF and BDNF in the two groups increased. The levels of serum Ang-1, VEGF and BDNF in the treatment group were significantly higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). After 3 weeks of treatment, the MOCA score of the treatment group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.05), and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion Compared with conventional therapy, hyperbaric oxygen combined with oxiracetam can promote the secretion of Ang-1, VEGF and BDNF in patients with post-traumatic cognitive impairment, thus improving the cognitive function of patients with post-traumatic cognitive impairment. Key words: Post-traumatic cognitive impairment; Angiopoietin-1; Vascular endothelial growth factor; Brain-derived neurotrophic factor; Hyperbaric oxygen; Oxiracetam

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChin J Neurotrauma Surg(Electronic Edition)Same topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207