MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028858211 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzaa049_046

Protein Requirements of Healthy Lactating Women Are Higher Than the Current Recommendations

2020· article· en· W3028858211 on OpenAlexaffabout
Betina Rasmussen, Madeleine Ennis, Paul B. Pencharz, Ronald O. Ball, Glenda Courtney‐Martin, Rajavel Elango

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreastfeedingLactationPhenylalanineEnergy requirementTyrosineResting energy expenditureAmino acidBreast milkMedicineAnimal scienceChemistryEndocrinologyBiologyPregnancyEnergy metabolismBiochemistryPediatricsPsychologyRegression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During lactation, a woman must eat an adequate amount of protein in order to maintain her own muscle mass, while also providing adequate nutrition to the infant through breast milk. The current Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI) for protein suggest, that healthy lactating women (0–6 mo postpartum) should consume an Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) of 1.05 g protein/kg/d. However, this recommendation is based on factorial calculations rather than direct experiments. Therefore, our objective was to determine the protein requirement for exclusively breastfeeding women, using the indicator amino acid oxidation (IAAO) technique. Eleven healthy women (31 ± 4.1y), exclusively breastfeeding (4.7 ± 1.2 mo postpartum), were randomly assigned to receive different test protein intakes ranging from 0.29–2.41 g/kg/d divided over 40 test intakes. Participants consumed eight hourly isocaloric and isonitrogenous meals, providing energy at 1.7 x resting energy expenditure. The diets consisted of a crystalline amino acid mixture based on the composition of egg protein, except phenylalanine and tyrosine which were maintained constant across intakes. Oxidation of the tracer amino acid (L-1–13C-phenylalanine), was used to determine protein requirements by measuring F13CO2 in breath samples, collected during each study day. A breakpoint (requirement) in F13CO2 was identified by linear regression crossover analysis. Our preliminary results suggest that the protein requirements for exclusively breastfeeding women (3–6 mo postpartum) is ∼1.7–1.9 g/kg/d. Our findings for dietary protein needs during lactation are higher than the current EAR of 1.05 g/kg/d recommended by the DRI, suggesting that the recommendations may be underestimated. Our results correspond well with our earlier findings of higher protein needs of 1.52 g/kg/d during late stages of pregnancy (∼36 wk gestation) determined using the IAAO method. Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Developments in NutritionSame topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207