Outcome of elderly patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) in British Columbia.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
8031 Background: Outcomes in elderly patients (pts) with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) have traditionally been poor. We evaluated the survival of elderly pts (>60 years [y]) with classical HL in British Columbia (BC). Methods: All pts aged >60 y newly diagnosed with classical HL from 1961 to 2019 were identified in the BC Cancer Lymphoid Cancer Database. Limited stage was defined as non-bulky (<10 cm) stage 1A/IB or 2A (before 2000 1B = advanced stage), with the remainder considered advanced stage. Results: Following exclusions (HIV positive n=4, incomplete data n=21, prior or concurrent other lymphoproliferative disease n=67), 713 pts were identified. With a median follow up of 6.0 y (0.1 - 24.0 y) in living pts, there has been an improvement in 5 y DSS/OS (both p<.001) by decade comparison: 1960s (n=52) 25%/17%; 1970s (n=75) 38%/31%; 1980s (n=90) 51%/43%; 1990s (n=115) 53%/42%; 2000s (n=180) 66%/57%; 2010s (n=201) 63%/53%. To account for advances in diagnosis, staging, supportive care, and therapy in the modern era, we evaluated the outcome of pts diagnosed since 01/1995. A total of 368 pts were treated with curative intent (Table). Most pts received multi-agent chemotherapy (n=359, 98%: ABVD[like] n=351, alkylator-based n=7, CHOP n=1), 8 pts had radiotherapy (RT) alone, and 1 pt had surgery (primary CNS HL). The 5 y DSS, PFS, and OS were 74%, 57%, and 62%, respectively. Increasing age was associated with inferior outcomes (5 y DSS/PFS/OS): 61-70 y (81%/70%/74%), 71-80 y (69%/47%/52%), and >80 y (59%/27%/31%) (DSS p=.011; PFS p<.0001; OS p<.0001). Of 318 pts that received bleomycin, 60 (19%) developed pulmonary toxicity, including 22 cases that occurred after cycles 1 and 2. Overall, 24/368 pts (7%) died of acute treatment toxicity (pulmonary [bleomycin n=10, radiation n=1], infection n=10, cardiac n=3). There was no association between age and developing bleomycin (p=.80) or lethal treatment toxicities (p=.74). Conclusions: The outcome of elderly pts with HL has improved in recent decades. However, treatment related toxicity remains a concern and use of multi-agent chemotherapy, particularly bleomycin-containing regimens, should be undertaken with caution. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".