MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3028966667 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzaa040_079

A 16-week Randomized Controlled Trial of a Fish Oil and Whey Protein-Derived Supplement to Improve Physical Performance in Older Adults Losing Autonomy – A Pilot Study

2020· article· en· W3028966667 on OpenAlex
Anne‐Julie Tessier, Julia Lévy-Ndejuru, Audrey Moyen, Marissa Lawson, Marie Lamarche, José A. Morais, Amritpal S. Bhullar, Francis Andriamampionona, Vera C. Mazurak, Stéphanie Chevalier

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de MontréalUniversity of AlbertaMcGill University Health CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFish oilMedicineRandomized controlled trialPhysical therapyPopulationPlaceboVitamin D and neurologyAnthropometryVitaminLean body massInternal medicineFish <Actinopterygii>Environmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Loss of autonomy is often the trigger for institutionalization of older adults. A nutritional intervention within a rehabilitation program may attenuate loss of muscle mass and function to enable continued autonomy in this understudied group of seniors. Objectives: 1) To assess the feasibility of a combined nutrient supplementation intervention with regards to recruitment, compliance, and completion of assessments in older adults losing autonomy; 2) to characterize this specific population. Seniors taking part in a rehabilitation program were randomized to an intervention with a supplement (EXP: 2 g fish oil (EPA+ DHA) with 1500 IU vitamin D3 1x/d+ 20–30 g whey protein powder with 3 g leucine 2x/d) or placebo (CTR; corn oil and maltodextrin powder) for 16 weeks. Lean soft tissue mass (LM) and physical function were assessed. LM (DXA) was measured at weeks 0 and 16, handgrip and knee extension strength (dynamometry), physical performance tests and plasma phospholipid n-3 fatty acids (GCMS) were evaluated at weeks 0, 8 and 16. Over 2 y, 244 patients were screened, 46 were eligible (18.9%; 95% CI: 15.0, 22.8), 20 were randomized, 10 completed the study (n = 4 in EXP; n = 6 in CTR). Median age was 87 y (77–94 y; 75% women), 35% had low LM, 35% were frail, 85% were using a walking aid daily and physical performance was low, at baseline. Overall self-reported compliance to powder was 96% (95% CI: 83, 108) and to oil, 85% (95% CI: 63, 107). The EXP median protein intake alone surpassed the target 1.2–1.5 g/kg/d for older adults, without altering usual diet. Proportions of EPA and DHA increased significantly 3- and 1.5-fold respectively at week 8 in EXP, with no change in CTR. Participants were able to complete most assessments with sustained guidance. Because of low eligibility limiting the pool of potential patients, the pilot study was interrupted as deemed non-feasible; however, compliance to supplements and the rigorous study assessments was high. Solutions to address recruitment, such as more liberal eligibility criteria, need to be considered in the design of a large-scale RCT before it can be carried out in this challenging population. Helen McCall Hutchison Award and Réseau québécois de la recherche sur le vieillissement of FRQS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.840

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it